Cycling

Controversy Surrounds Exeter Cycle Path Safety Demands

Aug 10, 2026, 6:14 PM

A former Reform UK councillor, now an independent representative for Pinhoe & Mincinglake, has called for significant alterations to a cycle path in Exeter. Councillor Ed Hill argues that the cycle lane, particularly where it intersects with a side road, is inherently unsafe and leads to frequent disputes between motorists and cyclists. He believes the design should mandate cyclists to yield to turning traffic, rather than the current arrangement which prioritizes cyclists. Hill's proposal comes after he filmed a series of videos highlighting what he perceives as hazardous conditions at the junction, particularly from the perspective of a large goods vehicle (LGV) driver, where blind spots make it difficult to see approaching cyclists.

Councillor Hill's videos and public statements emphasize the dangers of the existing setup, contending that drivers are unable to see cyclists in time to yield, even when exercising caution. He suggests that due to the speed of electric bikes, a cyclist can quickly enter a driver's blind spot, creating a high risk of collision. Hill points out that drivers must simultaneously contend with traffic from other directions, steering, and monitoring pedestrians, making it challenging to safely navigate the junction under current rules. He advocates for removing the 'give way' markings from the main road and instead installing them on the cycle path, along with 'slow' signs for cyclists, asserting that road design should account for human factors in driving behavior. He also extended his views on cyclist yielding to 'floating' bus stops, citing pedestrian safety concerns and advocating for pedestrian crossings at these locations, similar to designs implemented in London.

However, Hill's recommendations have met with opposition. A legal specialist, Shaun Jobber, refuted the councillor's claims, stressing that drivers have a responsibility to make adequate observations when approaching a turn, regardless of cycle path design. Jobber argued that cyclists do not materialize out of thin air and that drivers should be aware of their presence by observing mirrors and windows. Furthermore, Devon County Council stated that they have not received other concerns regarding the junction and that its design aligns with national cycling infrastructure guidelines and the 2021 Highway Code updates, which require drivers to yield to cyclists in such situations. The Exeter Cycling Campaign, while often disagreeing with Hill, supported his call for pedestrian crossings at floating bus stops, advocating for inclusive transport designs that prioritize all road users.

Ultimately, this ongoing discourse in Exeter about cycle path design and traffic priority underscores the critical need for balanced urban planning that ensures the safety and accessibility for all road users. A harmonious coexistence between different modes of transport is achievable through thoughtful infrastructure and clear, universally understood regulations that prioritize the well-being of every individual on the road.

Related Articles